×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: Chitinophaga niastensis Weon et al. 2009

Category, proposed as: species, sp. nov.

Etymology: ni.as.ten’sis. N.L. fem. adj. niastensis, pertaining to NIAST, the National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (Suwon, Republic of Korea), where taxonomic studies were conducted

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: khi-ti-NO-pha-ga ni-as-TEN-sis, feminine

Type strain: DSM 24859; JCM 15441; JS16-4; KACC 12954

16S rRNA gene: EU714260 Analysetree FASTA download

Valid publication: Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271. 🇰🇷

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 59, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2131-2132.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name (and explicitly recommended for medical use)

Risk group: 1

  • Notes:
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The term "phylogenetic definition" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
    • 😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
    • 🎓 Name mentioned 7 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
    • 🙆 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded pathogenicity of other species in the genus.
    • 🧍 The distinct name Chitinophaga niabensis from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.
    • 🧍 The genome of the type strain was sequenced as part of the GEBA (Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea) project. Publication: Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083. 🇩🇪

Parent taxon: Chitinophaga Sangkhobol and Skerman 1981

Assigned by: Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271. 🇰🇷

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.787913Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 787913