Name: Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Sphingomonas subarctica Nohynek et al. 1996

Etymology: arc’ti.cus sub.arc’ti.cum L. pref. sub-, under, below; L. masc. adj. arcticus, northern, arctic; N.L. neut. adj. subarcticum, below the arctic, subartic, because the organism was isolated from a subarctic area, Finland

Gender: neuter

Type strains: CIP 105288; DSM 10700; HAMBI 2110; IFO 16058; JCM 10398; JCM 12332; KF1; NBRC 16058

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: X94102 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417.

IJSEM list: Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 51, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1621-1623.

Nomenclatural status: validly published

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Novosphingobium resinovorum (Delaporte and Daste 1956) Lim et al. 2007

Risk group: 1

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Novosphingobium resinovorum (Delaporte and Daste 1956) Lim et al. 2007	heterotypic synonym, validly published
    Sphingomonas subarctica Nohynek et al. 1996	homotypic synonym, validly published
    Flavobacterium resinovorum Delaporte and Daste 1956 (Approved Lists 1980)	heterotypic synonym, validly published

• Emendations:
  • Hördt et al. 2020 Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2020; 11:468.
    Notes:
    • As of 2020-04-15 this emendation was not yet included in an IJSEM List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion.

• Notes:
  • According to Lim et al. (2007), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Flavobacterium resinovorum Delaporte and Daste 1956 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Lim YW, Moon EY, Chun J. Reclassification of Flavobacterium resinovorum Delaporte and Daste 1956 as Novosphingobium resinovorum comb. nov., with Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 as a later heterotypic synonym. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1906-1908.
  • According to Lim et al. (2007), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Novosphingobium resinovorum (Delaporte and Daste 1956) Lim et al. 2007. Publication: Lim YW, Moon EY, Chun J. Reclassification of Flavobacterium resinovorum Delaporte and Daste 1956 as Novosphingobium resinovorum comb. nov., with Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 as a later heterotypic synonym. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1906-1908.
  • According to Rules 27(3) and 30, this name is not validly published because the effective publication makes no reference to the deposit of the type strain in any publicly accessible service collection, but deposits in at least two recognized culture collections in different countries are documented. According to the Judicial Opinion 81, Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 is to be considered to be validly published. Publication: Euzeby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301.

Parent taxon: Novosphingobium Takeuchi et al. 2001

Assigned by: Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/novosphingobium-subarcticumCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard