×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: Cosenzaea Giammanco et al. 2011

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Co.sen.zae’a. N.L. fem. n. Cosenzaea, named after Benjamin J. Cosenza, the microbiologist who first described this micro-organism as Proteus myxofaciens in 1966

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): feminine (stem: Cosenzae-), ko-sen-ZA͡E-a

Type species: Cosenzaea myxofaciens (Cosenza and Podgwaite 1966) Giammanco et al. 2011

Valid publication: Giammanco GM, Grimont PA, Grimont F, Lefevre M, Giammanco G, Pignato S. Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Proteus, Morganella and Providencia by comparison of rpoB gene sequences of type and clinical strains suggests the reclassification of Proteus myxofaciens in a new genus, Cosenzaea gen. nov., as Cosenzaea myxofaciens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1638-1644. 🇮🇹

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 7 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2331-2332.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980)

  • Notes:
    • 🧕 Yilmaz et al. (2014) assigned this genus to the family Enterobacteriaceae Rahn 1937 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Yilmaz P, Parfrey LW, Yarza P, Gerken J, Pruesse E, Quast C, Schweer T, Peplies J, Ludwig W, Glöckner FO. The SILVA and “all-species living tree project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Research 2014; 42(D1):D643-D648. 🇩🇪
    • 🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Proteus Hauser 1885 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Cosenza BJ, Podgwaite JD. A new species of Proteus isolated from larvae of the gypsy moth Porthetria dispar (L.). Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1966; 32:187-191.
    • 🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Casenzaea".
    • ❗ Cosenzaea is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
    • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: BCRC: 1; CCRC: 1; DSM: 1; CCUG: 1; NCIMB: 1; JCM: 1; ATCC: 1; LMG: 1; CIP: 1.
    • 🧍 In Fig. 1 of the paper by Behrendt et al. we see Cosenzaea myxofaciens embedded in a paraphyletic genus Proteus. For this reason, the analysis supports the view that Cosenzaea is a later heterotypic synonym of Proteus. Publication: Behrendt U, Wende S, Kolb S, Ulrich A. Genome-based phylogeny of the genera Proteus and Cosenzaea and description of Proteus terrae subsp. terrae subsp. nov. and Proteus terrae subsp. cibarius subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 71:0. 🇩🇪

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1
Total number of child taxa: 1

Parent taxon: Morganellaceae Adeolu et al. 2016

Assigned by: Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Naushad S, S Gupta R. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the 'Enterobacteriales': proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5575-5599. 🇨🇦

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.518101Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 518101