Genus Luteimonas

Name: Luteimonas Finkmann et al. 2000

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Lu.te.i’mo.nas. L. masc. adj. luteus, yellow; L. fem. n. monas, a unit; N.L. fem. n. Luteimonas, a yellow unit

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): feminine (stem: Luteimonad-), lu-te-I-mo-nas

Type species: Luteimonas mephitis Finkmann et al. 2000

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Finkmann W, Altendorf K, Stackebrandt E, Lipski A. Characterization of N2O-producing Xanthomonas-like isolates from biofilters as Stenotrophomonas nitritireducens sp. nov., Luteimonas mephitis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Pseudoxanthomonas broegbernensis gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:273-282. 🇩🇪

IJSEM list: Anonymous. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 50, part 1 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:425-426.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

Risk group: 1

• Notes:
  • 🧕 Brenner et al. (2005) assigned this genus to the family Xanthomonadaceae Saddler and Bradbury 2005. Publication: Saddler GS, Bradbury JF. Family I. Xanthomonadaceae fam. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part B (The Gammaproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 63. 🇺🇸
  • 💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Wei et al. (2024), Margesin et al. (2018). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.20627 (N = 1).
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: KCTC: 26; DSM: 17; CGMCC: 17; JCM: 13; CCTCC: 6; GDMCC: 5; KACC: 4; BCRC: 3; CCUG: 2; NCTC: 2.
  • 😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 42
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 44
Total number of child taxa: 48

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Luteimonas abyssi Fan et al. 2014	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas aestuarii Roh et al. 2009	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas aquatica Chou et al. 2008	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas arsenica Mu et al. 2016	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas campi Xu et al. 2026	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    "Luteimonas cellulosilyticus" Lin et al. 2020	not validly published	preferred name
    Luteimonas changyuni Liu et al. 2025	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas chenhongjianii Zhang et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    "Luteimonas colneyensis" Gilroy et al. 2021	not validly published	synonym
    Luteimonas colneyensis Pallen 2024	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas composti Young et al. 2007	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas cucumeris Sun et al. 2012	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas dalianensis Xin et al. 2026	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas deserti Huang et al. 2021	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas endophytica Wei et al. 2024	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    "Candidatus Luteimonas excrementigallinarum" Gilroy et al. 2021	not validly published	pro-correct name
    Luteimonas flava Lu et al. 2024	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas fraxinea Ulrich et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas galliterrae Shen et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas gilva Xiong et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas granuli Siddiqi et al. 2026	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas huabeiensis Wu et al. 2013	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas kalidii Wei et al. 2024	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas lumbrici Cha et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Luteimonas lutimaris Park et al. 2011	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas marina Baik et al. 2008	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas mephitis Finkmann et al. 2000	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas notoginsengisoli Cheng et al. 2016	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas padinae Verma et al. 2016	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas panaciterrae (Ten et al. 2009) Jin et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas pelagia Lin et al. 2016	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas qiangzhengi Liu et al. 2025	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas rhizosphaerae Zhao et al. 2018	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas rhizosphaericola Wei et al. 2024	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas salinilitoris Zhang et al. 2025	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas salinisoli Sun et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas saliphila Sun et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas soli Wang et al. 2015	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas suaedae Chen et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas terrae Ngo and Yin 2016	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas terricola Zhang et al. 2010	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas tolerans Rani et al. 2016	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Luteimonas vadosa Romanenko et al. 2013	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas viscosa Chen et al. 2025	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    "Luteimonas weifangensis" Zhang et al. 2020	not validly published	synonym
    Luteimonas wenzhouensis Zhou et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas yanweni Liu et al. 2025	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Luteimonas yindakuii Zhang et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	correct name

Parent taxon: Lysobacteraceae Christensen and Cook 1978 (Approved Lists 1980)

Assigned by: Naushad S, Adeolu M, Wong S, Sohail M, Schellhorn HE, Gupta RS. A phylogenomic and molecular marker based taxonomic framework for the order Xanthomonadales: proposal to transfer the families Algiphilaceae and Solimonadaceae to the order Nevskiales ord. nov. and to create a new family within the order Xanthomonadales, the family Rhodanobacteraceae fam. nov., containing the genus Rhodanobacter and its closest relatives. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:467-485. 🇨🇦

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.515982Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 515982