Name:Actinomadurameyerae corrig. Quintana et al. 2004
Category: Species
Proposed as: sp. nov.
Etymology:mey’er.ae.N.L. gen. fem. n.meyerae, of Meyer, named after the German microbiologist Jutta Meyer in recognition of her contributions to actinomycte systematics
Effective publication:
Quintana ET, Trujillo ME, Goodfellow M. Actinomadura mexicana sp. nov. and Actinomadura meyerii sp. nov., two novel soil sporoactinomycetes. Syst Appl Microbiol 2003; 26:511-517.
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Validation list no. 96. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:307-308.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Nouioui et al. 2018
Nouioui I, Carro L, Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Pukall R, Klenk HP, Goodfellow M, Goker M. Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2007.
Oren A, Garrity GM. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 29. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:13-32.
Notes:
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
🧍 According to Bartlett et al. (2022), this species is a putative human pathogen.Publication:
Bartlett A, Padfield D, Lear L, Bendall R, Vos M. A comprehensive list of bacterial pathogens infecting humans. Microbiology 2022; 168:0.
🧍 In the effective publication the strain A288 is erroneously cited as DSM 44485 = NRRL B-24203.Publication:
Euzeby JP. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590-592.
🧍 The original spelling of the specific epithet, meyerii (sic), has been corrected on validation according to Rule 61.Publication:
Euzeby JP. Validation list no. 98. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1005-1006.
🧍 The specific epithet is a N.L. n. not a L. n. as cited in the paper by Quintana et al. 2003.Publication:
Euzeby JP. Validation list no. 96. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:307-308.