×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: Catellibacterium Tanaka et al. 2004

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Ca.tel.li.bac.te’ri.um. L. fem. dim. n. catella, a small chain; N.L. neut. n. bacterium, a rod; N.L. neut. n. Catellibacterium, a chained small rod

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): neuter (stem: Catellibacteri-), ka-tel-li-bak-TE-ri-um

Type species: Catellibacterium nectariphilum Tanaka et al. 2004

Valid publication: Tanaka Y, Hanada S, Manome A, Tsuchida T, Kurane R, Nakamura K, Kamagata Y. Catellibacterium nectariphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., which requires a diffusible compound from a strain related to the genus Sphingomonas for vigorous growth. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:955-959. 🇯🇵

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 54, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1427-1428.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Gemmobacter Rothe et al. 1988

  • Emendations:
    • Liu et al. 2010 Liu Y, Xu CJ, Jiang JT, Liu YH, Song XF, Li H, Liu ZP. Catellibacterium aquatile sp. nov., isolated from fresh water, and emended description of the genus Catellibacterium Tanaka et al. 2004. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2027-2031. 🇨🇳 Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 60, part 9 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2695-2696.
      Notes:
      • ⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
      • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.
    • Zheng et al. 2011 Zheng JW, Chen YG, Zhang J, Ni YY, Li WJ, He J, Li SP. Description of Catellibacterium caeni sp. nov., reclassification of Rhodobacter changlensis Anil Kumar et al. 2007 as Catellibacterium changlense comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Catellibacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1921-1926. 🇨🇳 Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2566-2567.
      Notes:
      • ⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 2 new species in the genus.
      • 🧍 In the paper by Zheng et al. 2011, Catellibacterium Tanaka et al. 2004 is erroneously cited as Catellibacterium Tanaka et al. 2005.
    • Zhang et al. 2012 Zhang J, Chen SA, Zheng JW, Cai S, Hang BJ, He J, Li SP. Catellibacterium nanjingense sp. nov., a propanil-degrading bacterium isolated from activated sludge, and emended description of the genus Catellibacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:495-499. 🇨🇳 Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1221-1222.
      Notes:
      • ⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
      • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.
  • Notes:
    • 🧕 Liu et al. (2010) assigned this genus to the family Rhodobacteraceae Garrity et al. 2006. Publication: Liu Y, Xu CJ, Jiang JT, Liu YH, Song XF, Li H, Liu ZP. Catellibacterium aquatile sp. nov., isolated from fresh water, and emended description of the genus Catellibacterium Tanaka et al. 2004. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2027-2031. 🇨🇳
    • 🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Gemmobacter Rothe et al. 1988. Publication: Chen WM, Cho NT, Huang WC, Young CC, Sheu SY. Description of Gemmobacter fontiphilus sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater spring, reclassification of Catellibacterium nectariphilum as Gemmobacter nectariphilus comb. nov., Catellibacterium changlense as Gemmobacter changlensis comb. nov., Catellibacterium aquatile as Gemmobacter aquaticus nom. nov., Catellibacterium caeni as Gemmobacter caeni comb. nov., Catellibacterium nanjingense as Gemmobacter nanjingensis comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Gemmobacter and of Gemmobacter aquatilis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:470-478. 🇹🇼
    • ❗ Catellibacterium is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
    • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.12150 (N = 1).
    • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 3; CGMCC: 2; JCM: 2; NBRC: 2; CCUG: 1; CCTCC: 1; KCTC: 1.
    • 🧍 The noun bacterium is a L. n., not a N.L. n. as cited in the etymology provided by Tanaka et al. 2004. Publication: Euzeby JP. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590-592. 🇫🇷

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 5
Total number of child taxa: 5

Parent taxon: Paracoccaceae Liang et al. 2022

Assigned by: Goker M. Filling the gaps: missing taxon names at the ranks of class, order and family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5638. 🇩🇪

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.515318Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 515318