Valid publication:
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Lee CH, Oh TK. Dokdonia donghaensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2323-2328. 🇰🇷
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 55, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:319-321.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Emendations:
Yoon et al. 2012
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Park S, Oh TK. Reclassification of the three species of the genus Krokinobacter into the genus Dokdonia as Dokdonia genika comb. nov., Dokdonia diaphoros comb. nov. and Dokdonia eikasta comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Dokdonia Yoon et al. 2005. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1896-1901. 🇰🇷
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2555-2556. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 3 new species in the genus.
Notes:
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Doktonia".
💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Choi et al. (2018), Park et al. (2018). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.05390 (N = 4).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: KCTC: 6; JCM: 4; CIP: 4; NBRC: 4; DSM: 2; CGMCC: 2; MCCC: 1; KACC: 1; CCTCC: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 10 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 10 Total number of child taxa: 11