Name: Pseudochryseolinea Wang et al. 2022

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Pseu.do.chry.se.o.li’ne.a. Gr. masc./fem. adj. pseudês, false; N.L. fem. n. Chryseolinea, the name of a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n. Pseudochryseolinea, a false chryseolinea

Gender: feminine (stem: Pseudochryseoline-)

Type species: Pseudochryseolinea flava (Wang et al. 2018) Wang et al. 2022

Valid publication: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Göker M. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 72, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5736.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Chryseolinea Kim et al. 2013

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Chryseolinea Kim et al. 2013	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Chryseolinea Kim et al. 2013. Publication: Wang JJ, Chen Q, Li YZ. Chryseolinea flava sp. nov., a new species of Chryseolinea isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3518-3522.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • ❗ Pseudochryseolinea is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.01434 (N = 6).
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: CGMCC: 1; JCM: 1.
  • 🧍 The distinct name Parachryseolinea from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1
Total number of child taxa: 1

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Pseudochryseolinea flava (Wang et al. 2018) Wang et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym

Parent taxon: Fulvivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020

Assigned by: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/pseudochryseolineaCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 30238