IJSEM list:
Anonymous. Validation list no. 77. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1953.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
homotypic synonym, not validly published, distinct rank
Notes:
⏲ According to Alessa et al. (2021), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Methylorubrumextorquens (Urakami and Komagata 1984 ex Bassalik 1913) Green and Ardley 2018.Publication:
Alessa O, Ogura Y, Fujitani Y, Takami H, Hayashi T, Sahin N, Tani A. Comprehensive Comparative Genomics and Phenotyping of Methylobacterium Species. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:740610.
⏲ According to Alessa et al. (2021), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Protomonasextorquens (ex Bassalik 1913) Urakami and Komagata 1984.Publication:
Alessa O, Ogura Y, Fujitani Y, Takami H, Hayashi T, Sahin N, Tani A. Comprehensive Comparative Genomics and Phenotyping of Methylobacterium Species. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:740610.
⏲ According to Kato et al. (2005), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Methylorubrumextorquens (Urakami and Komagata 1984 ex Bassalik 1913) Green and Ardley 2018.Publication:
Kato Y, Asahara M, Arai D, Goto K, Yokota A. Reclassification of Methylobacterium chloromethanicum and Methylobacterium dichloromethanicum as later subjective synonyms of Methylobacterium extorquens and of Methylobacterium lusitanum as a later subjective synonym of Methylobacterium rhodesianum. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2005; 51:287-299.
⏲ According to Kato et al. (2005), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Methylobacteriumextorquens (Urakami and Komagata 1984 ex Bassalik 1913) Bousfield and Green 1985.Publication:
Kato Y, Asahara M, Arai D, Goto K, Yokota A. Reclassification of Methylobacterium chloromethanicum and Methylobacterium dichloromethanicum as later subjective synonyms of Methylobacterium extorquens and of Methylobacterium lusitanum as a later subjective synonym of Methylobacterium rhodesianum. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2005; 51:287-299.
⏲ According to Kato et al. (2005), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Protomonasextorquens (ex Bassalik 1913) Urakami and Komagata 1984.Publication:
Kato Y, Asahara M, Arai D, Goto K, Yokota A. Reclassification of Methylobacterium chloromethanicum and Methylobacterium dichloromethanicum as later subjective synonyms of Methylobacterium extorquens and of Methylobacterium lusitanum as a later subjective synonym of Methylobacterium rhodesianum. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2005; 51:287-299.
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.16718 (N = 3).
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
🎓 Name mentioned 18 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.
🧍 The phylogenetic position of this species was determined in a genome-scale analysis by Hördt et al. (2020).Publication:
Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 2 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2 Total number of child taxa: 2