Name: Pseudoroseomonas deserti (Subhash and Lee 2018) Rai et al. 2022

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Roseomonas deserti Subhash and Lee 2018

Etymology: de.ser’ti. L. gen. neut. n. deserti, of a desert

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: pse͡u-do-ro-se-O-mo-nas de-SER-ti, feminine

Type strain: JCM 31275; KEMB 2255-459; M 3

See detailed strain information at

16S rRNA gene: LT545980 Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Teichococcus deserti (Subhash and Lee 2018) Liu and Xin 2025

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Roseomonas deserti Subhash and Lee 2018	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Teichococcus deserti (Subhash and Lee 2018) Liu and Xin 2025	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • ❗ Pseudoroseomonas deserti is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudoroseomonas.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 0 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
  • 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.

Parent taxon: Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022

Assigned by: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.26574Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 26574