Name: Pseudoroseomonas ludipueritiae (Kämpfer et al. 2003) Rai et al. 2022

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Teichococcus ludipueritiae Kämpfer et al. 2003

Etymology: lu.di.pu.e.ri’ti.ae. L. masc. n. ludus, a place of exercise or practice, a school for elementary instruction; L. masc. n. puer, a child (gen. pueri); N.L. gen. masc. n. ludipueritiae, of a playing place of childhood, intended to mean a kindergarten

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: … lu-di-pu-e-RI-ti-a͡e, feminine

Type strain: 170/96; CIP 107418; DSM 14915

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: AJ488504 Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP, illegitimate name

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Teichococcus ludipueritiae Kämpfer et al. 2003

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Roseomonas ludipueritiae (Kämpfer et al. 2003) Sánchez-Porro et al. 2009	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Teichococcus ludipueritiae Kämpfer et al. 2003	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 0 times in PubMed until 2025-06-04.
  • 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.
  • 🧍 Pseudoroseomonas ludipueritiae (Kämpfer et al. 2003) Rai et al. 2022 is illegitimate because it is a homotypic synonym of a type species with a genus name that has priority. Publication: Kampfer P, Andersson MA, Jackel U, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Teichococcus ludipueritiae gen. nov. sp. nov., and Muricoccus roseus gen. nov. sp. nov. representing two new genera of the alpha-1 subclass of the Proteobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 2003; 26:23-29. 🇩🇪

Parent taxon: Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022

Assigned by: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pseudoroseomonas-ludipueritiaeCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 26634