heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICN (Botanical Code), illegitimate name
Notes:
🛺 The type genus of this family has been placed in the family Nostocaceae Eichler 1886.Publication:
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51. 🇨🇿
🚋 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Nostocaceae Eichler 1886.Publication:
Komárek J, Golubić S. Guide to the Nomenclature and formal taxonomic treatment of oxyphototroph prokaryotes (Cyanoprokaryotes). Published by the Authors, Třeboň and Boston, 1990.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Mostocaceae"; "Naostocaceae"; "Nastocaceae"; "Noestocaceae"; "Nosfecaceae"; "Nosfocaceae"; "Nosiocaceae"; "Nosivcaceae"; "Noslocaceae"; "Nosmcaceae"; "Nosrocaceae"; "Nostccaceae"; "Nostocacees"; "Nostockaceae"; "Nostococcaceae"; "Nostooaceae"; "Nostoohaceae"; "Nostoraceae"; "Noststocaceae"; "Vostocaceae"; "Xostocaceae".
🧍 Later isonym of Nostocaceae Eichler 1886.Publication:
Eichler AW. Syllabus der Vorlesungen über specielle und medicinisch-pharmaceutische Botanik, 4. Aufl. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1886.
Assigned by:
LPSN automated production system. The following publication is only one of the sources consulted.
It may or may not mention this taxon name. —
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51. 🇨🇿
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.50417Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
50417
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.