×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: "Sirosiphoniaceae" Rabenhorst 1863

Category, proposed as: family, fam. nov.

Gender: feminine

Type genus: "Sirosiphon" Kützing 1843

Original publication: Rabenhorst L. Kryptogamen-Flora von Sachsen, Ober-Lausitz, Thüringen und Nord-Böhmen, mit Berücksichtigung der benachbarten Länder: erste Abtheilung: Algen im weitesten Sinne, Leber und Laubmoose. Verlag von Eduard Kummer, Leipzig, 1863.

Nomenclatural status: inaccurate spelling

Taxonomic status: misspelling (and no standing)

Correct name: Stigonemataceae corrig. (Agardh ex Bornet and Flahault 1886) Borzì 1892

  • Notes:
    • 🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Nostocaceae Eichler 1886. Publication: Eichler AW. Syllabus der Vorlesungen über specielle und medicinisch-pharmaceutische Botanik, 4. Aufl. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin, 1886.
    • 🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Sirosiphonaceae Frank 1886. Publication: Frank AB. Dr. Johannes Leunis Synopsis der Pflanzenkunde. Aufl. 3. Band. 3 Specielle Botanik. Kryptogamen. Hahn'sche Buchhandlung, Hannover, 1886.
    • 🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Birosiphoniaceae"; "Siresiphoniaceae".

Parent taxon: Nostocales corrig. Borzì 1914

Assigned by: LPSN automated production system. The following publication is only one of the sources consulted. It may or may not mention this taxon name. — Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51. 🇨🇿

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.48786Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 48786