Subscribe to our newsletter
To receive updates from LPSN every few months, sign up to our mailing list.
Genus Neoroseomonas
Name: Neoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022
Etymology: Ne.o.ro.se.o.mo’nas. Gr. masc. adj. neos, new; N.L. fem. n. Roseomonas, a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n. Neoroseomonas, to refer to the fact that it is a new group of Roseomonas
Gender: feminine (stem: Neoroseomonad-)
Type species: Neoroseomonas lacus (Jiang et al. 2006) Rai et al. 2022
Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS
Effective publication:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.
Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status: correct name
-
Notes:
-
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998.
Publication:
Jiang CY, Dai X, Wang BJ, Zhou YG, Liu SJ. Roseomonas lacus sp. nov., isolated from freshwater lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:25-28.
- 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
- 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.02308 (N = 5).
- 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 4; NBRC: 3; KCTC: 3; DSM: 2; CGMCC: 2; BCRC: 1.
-
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998.
Publication:
Jiang CY, Dai X, Wang BJ, Zhou YG, Liu SJ. Roseomonas lacus sp. nov., isolated from freshwater lake sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:25-28.
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 9
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 9
Total number of child taxa: 9
-
Child taxa:
-
Name Nomenclatural status Taxonomic status Neoroseomonas alkaliterrae (Dong et al. 2014) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas eburnea (Wang et al. 2016) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas lacus (Jiang et al. 2006) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas marina Rai et al. 2023 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas oryzicola (Chung et al. 2015) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas rubea (Lee and Whang 2022) Liu and Xin 2025 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas sediminicola (He et al. 2019) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas soli (Kim and Ka 2014) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name Neoroseomonas terrae (Yoon et al. 2007) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP correct name
-
Parent taxon: Acetobacteraceae (ex Henrici 1939) Gillis and De Ley 1980
Assigned by:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.
Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/neoroseomonasLink copied to clipboard
Record number: 26502
This LPSN page was printed on 2025-04-20 00:22:49