Effective publication:
Asai T. Taxonomic studies on acetic acid bacteria and allied oxidative bacteria isolated from fruits. A new classification of the oxidative bacteria. Journal of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan 1935; 11:674-708.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Kluyver AJ, De Leeuw FJG. Acetobacter suboxydans, een merkwaardige azijnbacterie. Tijdschrift voor vergeeijkende geneeskunde, gezondheidsleer en parasitaire en infectieziekten 1924; 10:170-281.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Beijerinck M. Über Pigmentbildung bei Essigbakterien. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abteilung II 1911; 29:169-176.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Acetomonas" Leifson 1954.Publication:
Leifson E. The flagellation and taxonomy of species of Acetobacter. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1954; 20:102-110.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Bacterium" Ehrenberg 1831.Publication:
Henneberg W. Bacterium industrium und B. ascendens und Ergänzungen zu den bisherigen untersuchungen ueber Essigbakteriën. Deutsche Essigindustrie 1898; 2:145-148.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Bacterium" Ehrenberg 1831.Publication:
Henneberg W. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Essigbakteriën. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abteilung II 1897; 3:223-231.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Cluccnobacter"; "Cluconobacter"; "Ghconobacter"; "Giuconobacter"; "Gluckonobacter"; "Glucnobacter"; "Glucollobacter"; "Gluconbacter"; "Gluconobacler"; "Gluconobactcr"; "Gluconohacter"; "Glwconobacter"; "Gtuconobacter".
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.13772 (N = 7).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: NBRC: 18; LMG: 16; IFO: 12; BCC: 11; DSM: 10; CIP: 7; ATCC: 6; JCM: 5; NCCB: 4; IAM: 3.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🧍 Pittman et al. (1991) suggested the abbreviation "GNBT" for this genus name but this does not appear to be of practical relevance any longer.Publication:
Pittman KF, Walczak CA, Lock CM. Codes and abbreviations for approved of effectively published names of genera of bacteria published from January 1980 to December 1990. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:571-579.
🧍 See also Asai and Shoda (1958).Publication:
Asai T, Shoda K. The taxonomy of Acetobacter and allied oxidative bacteria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology 1958; 4:289-311.
🧍 On the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names, this name is incorrectly cited as Gluconobacter (Asai 1935) Asai et al. 1964 (sic).Publication:
Hill LR, Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA. Corrigenda to the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names edited for the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1984; 34:508-511. 🇬🇧
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 17 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 20 Total number of child taxa: 29