Valid publication:
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh TK. Reclassification of Marinococcus albus Hao et al. 1985 as Salimicrobium album gen. nov., comb. nov. and Bacillus halophilus Ventosa et al. 1990 as Salimicrobium halophilum comb. nov., and description of Salimicrobium luteum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2406-2411. 🇰🇷
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 57, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:3-4.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Notes:
🧕 Chuvochina et al. (2023) assigned this genus to the family Halobacillaceae Chuvochina et al. 2024.Publication:
Chuvochina M, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil PA, Skarshewski A, Rinke C, Parks DH, Hugenholtz P. Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the Genome Taxonomy Database under two prokaryotic codes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2023; 0:0. 🇦🇺
🧕 Li et al. (2024) assigned this genus to the family Amphibacillaceae Chuvochina et al. 2024.Publication:
Li Y, Zhang D, Bo D, Peng D, Sun M, Zheng J. A taxonomic note on the order Caryophanales: description of 12 novel families and emended description of 21 families. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6539. 🇨🇳
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Marinococcus Hao et al. 1985.Publication:
Hao MV, Kocur M, Komagata K. Marinococcus gen. nov., a new genus for motile cocci with meso-diaminopimelic acid in the cell wall; and Marinococcus albus sp. nov. and Marinococcus halophilus (Novitsky and Kushner) comb. nov. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1984; 30:449-459.
💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of De la Haba et al. (2011), Yoon et al. (2009). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The usage of the term "coherent taxon" (or equivalent) is cautioned against. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.01991 (N = 9).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 4; DSM: 4; KCTC: 3; LMG: 3; CCM: 2; NBRC: 2; ATCC: 2; CIP: 2; CCUG: 1; VKM: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 6 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 6 Total number of child taxa: 7
Assigned by:
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh TK. Reclassification of Marinococcus albus Hao et al. 1985 as Salimicrobium album gen. nov., comb. nov. and Bacillus halophilus Ventosa et al. 1990 as Salimicrobium halophilum comb. nov., and description of Salimicrobium luteum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2406-2411. 🇰🇷
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.517671Link copied to clipboard