Name: "Candidatus Eremiobacterota" corrig. Ji et al. 2017
Category: Phylum
Proposed as: Candidatus
Etymology:
E.re.mi.o.bac.te.ro’ta. N.L. masc. n.Eremiobacter, a Candidatus genus name; L. neut. pl. n. suff.-ota, ending to denote a phylum; N.L. neut. pl. n.Eremiobacterota, the Candidatus Eremiobacter phylum
Effective publication:
Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, Montgomery K, Lines T, Beardall J, van Dorst J, et al. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature 2017; 552:400-403.
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Göker M. "Candidatus phylum list no. 1." Lists of names of prokaryotic Candidatus phyla. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5821.
Nomenclatural status:
not validly published
Nomenclatural pro-status:
pro-validly published under the ICNP
🧕 Ji et al. (2021) assigned this phylum to the domain "Bacteria" Woese et al. 1990.Publication:
Ji M, Williams TJ, Montgomery K, Wong HL, Zaugg J, Berengut JF, Bissett A, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P, Ferrari BC. Candidatus Eremiobacterota, a metabolically and phylogenetically diverse terrestrial phylum with acid-tolerant adaptations. ISME J 2021; 15:2692-2707.
🧒 Ji et al. (2021) assigned the class "Candidatus Xenobia" Ji et al. 2021 to this phylum.Publication:
Ji M, Williams TJ, Montgomery K, Wong HL, Zaugg J, Berengut JF, Bissett A, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P, Ferrari BC. Candidatus Eremiobacterota, a metabolically and phylogenetically diverse terrestrial phylum with acid-tolerant adaptations. ISME J 2021; 15:2692-2707.
🧒 Ji et al. (2021) assigned the class "Candidatus Xenobiia" corrig. Ji et al. 2021 to this phylum.Publication:
Ji M, Williams TJ, Montgomery K, Wong HL, Zaugg J, Berengut JF, Bissett A, Chuvochina M, Hugenholtz P, Ferrari BC. Candidatus Eremiobacterota, a metabolically and phylogenetically diverse terrestrial phylum with acid-tolerant adaptations. ISME J 2021; 15:2692-2707.
🧒 Paoli et al. (2022) assigned the class "Candidatus Eudoremicrobiia" Paoli et al. 2022 to this phylum.Publication:
Paoli L, Ruscheweyh HJ, Forneris CC, Hubrich F, Kautsar S, Bhushan A, Lotti A, Clayssen Q, Salazar G, Milanese A, et al. Biosynthetic potential of the global ocean microbiome. Nature 2022; 607:111-118.
🧒 Ward et al. (2019) assigned the class "Candidatus Eremiobacteriia" Ward et al. 2019 to this phylum.Publication:
Ward LM, Cardona T, Holland-Moritz H. Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2). Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1658.
🧒 Ward et al. (2019) assigned the class "Candidatus Eremiobacteria" corrig. Ward et al. 2019 to this phylum.Publication:
Ward LM, Cardona T, Holland-Moritz H. Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2). Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1658.
🧒 Ward et al. (2019) assigned the order "Candidatus Eremiobacterales" Ward et al. 2019 to this phylum.Publication:
Ward LM, Cardona T, Holland-Moritz H. Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2). Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1658.
🧒 Ward et al. (2019) assigned the order "Rubrimentiphilales" to this phylum.Publication:
Ward LM, Cardona T, Holland-Moritz H. Evolutionary Implications of Anoxygenic Phototrophy in the Bacterial Phylum Candidatus Eremiobacterota (WPS-2). Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1658.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Eremiobacteriota".
❗ "Candidatus Eremiobacterota" is the pro-correct name instead if this phylum is regarded as a separate phylum (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another phylum whose name is validly published and legitimate or pro-validly published and pro-legitimate and not rejected and has priority or pro-priority).