Effective publication:
Uchino M, Shida O, Uchimura T, Komagata K. Recharacterization of Pseudomonas fulva Iizuka and Komagata 1963, and proposals of Pseudomonas parafulva sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cremoricolorata sp. nov. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2001; 47:247-261. 🇯🇵
IJSEM list:
Anonymous. Validation list no. 85. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:685-690.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name (and explicitly recommended for medical use)
Risk group:
1
Notes:
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.00761 (N = 9).
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 25 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🪓 Organisms assigned to this species have previously been classified as Pseudomonasfulva Iizuka and Komagata 1963 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Iizuka H, Komagata K. New species of Pseudomonas belonged to fluorescent group (Studies on the microorganisms of cereal grains. Part V). Journal of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan 1963; 37:137-141.
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
🙆 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of other species in the genus.
🧍 The genome of the type strain was sequenced as part of the GEBA (Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea) project.Publication:
Mukherjee S, Seshadri R, Varghese NJ, Eloe-Fadrosh EA, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Goker M, Coates RC, Hadjithomas M, Pavlopoulos GA, Paez-Espino D, et al. 1,003 reference genomes of bacterial and archaeal isolates expand coverage of the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 2017; 35:676-683. 🇺🇸
🧍 According to Rules 27(3) and 30, this name is not validly published, because the original publication makes reference to the deposit of the type strain in a single recognized culture collection. However, according to the Judicial Opinion 81, Pseudomonas parafulva Uchino et al. 2002 is considered to be validly published, since deposit in a second culture collection in a different country has been documented.Publication:
Judicial Commission. Judicial Opinion No. 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755-1763.
🧍 In Validation List no. 85, the reference of the effective publication is erroneously cited as J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 2001, 46, 247-261.Publication:
Euzeby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. 🇫🇷
Assigned by:
Uchino M, Shida O, Uchimura T, Komagata K. Recharacterization of Pseudomonas fulva Iizuka and Komagata 1963, and proposals of Pseudomonas parafulva sp. nov. and Pseudomonas cremoricolorata sp. nov. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2001; 47:247-261. 🇯🇵
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.780090Link copied to clipboard