Etymology:
cis.si.co.la. N.L. fem. n.Cissus, generic name of flowering plant; L. masc./fem. n. suff.-cola, dweller; from L. masc./fem. n.incola, dweller; N.L. masc./fem. n.cissicola, Cissus dweller
Effective publication:
Burkholder WH. Genus I. Pseudomonas Migula. Bacterial plant pathogens. In: Breed RS, Murray EGD, Hitchens AP (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 6th ed., The Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore, 1948, p. 82-150.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
homotypic synonym, not validly published, basonym of name in Approved Lists
Notes:
⏲ According to Saati-Santamaria et al. (2021), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Xanthomonascitri (ex Hasse 1915) Gabriel et al. 1989 but this is in conflict with the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.Publication:
Saati-Santamaria Z, Peral-Aranega E, Velazquez E, Rivas R, Garcia-Fraile P. Phylogenomic Analyses of the Genus Pseudomonas Lead to the Rearrangement of Several Species and the Definition of New Genera. Biology (Basel) 2021; 10:0.
🏢 Synonymy of this taxon was mentioned in an IJSEM list.Publication:
Oren A, Garrity GM. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 35. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5164.
❗ Pseudomonascissicola is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudomonas.
😷 The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "PP". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "p". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.
🧍 According to Ludwig et al. (2021), this "species affiliates away from its type species and may be reclassified as Xanthomonas".Publication:
Ludwig W, Viver T, Westram R, Francisco Gago J, Bustos-Caparros E, Knittel K, Amann R, Rossello-Mora R. Release LTP_12_2020, featuring a new ARB alignment and improved 16S rRNA tree for prokaryotic type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2021; 44:126218.
🧍 Plant pathogenic according to Bull et al. (2007).Publication:
Bull CT, De Boer SH, Denny TP, Firrao G, Fischer Le Saux M, Saddler GS, Scortichini M, Stead DE, Takikawa Y. Comprehensive list of names of plant pathogenic bacteria, 1980-2007. Journal of Plant Pathology 2010; 92:551-592.
🧍 The type strain was obviously mislabeled at several culture collections. These errors have caused considerable confusion in the taxonomic placement of Pseudomonas cissicola. The type strain of Pseudomonas cissicola should be strain PC1 in the culture collection of plant-pathogenic bacteria, Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Shizuoka University (836 Ohya, Shizuoka 422, Japan) [1], strain ATCC 33616 [1], strain CCM 2888 [1], strain CFBP 2432 [2], ICMP 8561 [2], LMG 2167 [2], or NCPPB 2982 [2].Publication:
Goto M. Taxonomic confusion of Pseudomonas cissicola originated from mislabeling by International Type Culture Collections. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1992; 42:503-505.
Assigned by:
Burkholder WH. Genus I. Pseudomonas Migula. Bacterial plant pathogens. In: Breed RS, Murray EGD, Hitchens AP (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 6th ed., The Williams & Wilkins Co, Baltimore, 1948, p. 82-150.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pseudomonas-cissicolaLink copied to clipboard