Name:Bacillusthermantarcticus corrig. Nicolaus et al. 2002
Category: Species
Proposed as: sp. nov.
Etymology:therm.ant.arc’ti.cus.Gr. masc. adj.thermos, hot; L. masc. adj.antarcticus, southern, belonging to the Antarctica; N.L. masc. adj.thermantarcticus, a hot (bacterium) from Antarctica, isolated from Antarctic geothermal soil
Effective publication:
Nicolaus B, Lama L, Esposito E, Manca MC, di Prisco G, Gambacorta A. ‘‘ Bacillus thermoantarcticus '' sp. nov., from Mount Melbourne, Antarctica : a novel thermophilic species. Polar Biol 1996; 16:101-104. 🇮🇹
IJSEM list:
Anonymous. Validation list no. 84. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:3-4.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
synonym (and not recommended for medical use)
📧 The e-mail address of the corresponding author given in the effective publication is not functional any more.
❗ Bacillusthermantarcticus is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Bacillus.
😷 The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 4 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of other species in the genus.
🧍 According to Rules 27(3) and 30, this name is not validly published, because the original publication makes reference to the deposit of the type strain in a single recognized culture collection. However, according to the Judicial Opinion 81, Bacillus thermantarcticus corrig. Nicolaus et al. 2002 is considered to be validly published, since deposit in a second culture collection in a different country has been documented.Publication:
Euzeby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. 🇫🇷
🧍 The original spelling of the specific epithet, thermoantarcticus (sic), has been corrected on validation according to Rule 61.Publication:
Anonymous. Validation list no. 84. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:3-4.
Assigned by:
Nicolaus B, Lama L, Esposito E, Manca MC, di Prisco G, Gambacorta A. ‘‘ Bacillus thermoantarcticus '' sp. nov., from Mount Melbourne, Antarctica : a novel thermophilic species. Polar Biol 1996; 16:101-104. 🇮🇹
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.773852Link copied to clipboard