Valid publication:
Manes-Lazaro R, Ferrer S, Rodas AM, Urdiain M, Pardo I. Lactobacillus bobalius sp. nov., a lactic acid bacterium isolated from Spanish Bobal grape must. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2699-2703.
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 58, part 12 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:452-453.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
⏲ According to Pang et al. (2012), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacilluskimchii Yoon et al. 2000.Publication:
Pang H, Kitahara M, Tan Z, Wang Y, Qin G, Ohkuma M, Cai Y. Reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2383-2387.
⏲ According to Pang et al. (2012), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacillusparalimentarius Cai et al. 1999.Publication:
Pang H, Kitahara M, Tan Z, Wang Y, Qin G, Ohkuma M, Cai Y. Reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2383-2387.
⏲ According to Pang et al. (2012), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacilluskimchii (Yoon et al. 2000) Zheng et al. 2020.Publication:
Pang H, Kitahara M, Tan Z, Wang Y, Qin G, Ohkuma M, Cai Y. Reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2383-2387.
⏲ According to Pang et al. (2012), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacillusparalimentarius (Cai et al. 1999) Zheng et al. 2020.Publication:
Pang H, Kitahara M, Tan Z, Wang Y, Qin G, Ohkuma M, Cai Y. Reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2383-2387.
⏲ According to Yang et al. (2017), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacillusparalimentarius Cai et al. 1999.Publication:
Yang SJ, Kim BY, Chun J. Rejection of reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius using comparative genomics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4515-4517.
⏲ According to Yang et al. (2017), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacillusparalimentarius (Cai et al. 1999) Zheng et al. 2020.Publication:
Yang SJ, Kim BY, Chun J. Rejection of reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius using comparative genomics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4515-4517.
⏲ According to Zheng et al. (2020), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacilluskimchii Yoon et al. 2000.Publication:
Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782-2858.
⏲ According to Zheng et al. (2020), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Lactobacillusparalimentarius Cai et al. 1999.Publication:
Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782-2858.
⏲ According to Zheng et al. (2020), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacilluskimchii (Yoon et al. 2000) Zheng et al. 2020.Publication:
Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782-2858.
⏲ According to Zheng et al. (2020), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Companilactobacillusparalimentarius (Cai et al. 1999) Zheng et al. 2020.Publication:
Zheng J, Wittouck S, Salvetti E, Franz CMAP, Harris HMB, Mattarelli P, O'Toole PW, Pot B, Vandamme P, Walter J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2782-2858.
🏢 Synonymy of this taxon was mentioned in an IJSEM list.Publication:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 70, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4050-4060.
❗ Lactobacillusbobalius is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Lactobacillus.
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 5 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.