homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Lactobacilluspanis is the correct name if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Lactobacillus.
See also DSMZ: Search Catalogue of Microbial Strains.Publication:
Euzeby JP. List of Bacterial Names with Standing in Nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:590-592.
However, the type strain of Lactobacillus panis DSM 6035 has been transferred from the patent/safe deposit department to the public part of the DSMZ and is now available without any restriction [2, 3]. — Weiss N. Personal communication, 1999-11-23.
So, Lactobacillus panis is a validly published and legitimate name [4, 5].Publication:
De Vos P, Trüper HG. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 14, 15 and 18 August 1999, Sydney, Australia. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2000; 50:2239-2244.
The members of the Subcommittee on Taxonomy of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Related Organisms concluded (meeting in Budapest, Hungary, August 1996) that Lactobacillus panis Wiese et al. 1996 is not a validly published name because the type strain of has been deposited in the closed collection of the DSM. Therefore, Dellaglio and Klein requested an opinion which indicates wether this name should be rejected according to Rule 30 (3), recommendation 30a, and Principle 1 . As yet this request is provisional.Publication:
Dellaglio F, Klein G. Rejection of Lactobacillus panis (Wiese et al. 1996). Request for an opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997; 47:910.