Effective publication:
Holdeman LV, Moore WEC. New genus, Coprococcus, twelve new species, and emended descriptions of four previously described species of bacteria from human feces. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1974; 24:260-277.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Notes:
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.02280 (N = 29).
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No". — The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
🎓 Name mentioned 8 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.
🧍 According to Ludwig et al. (2021), this "species is a true member of Lachnospira, and needs to be reclassified".Publication:
Ludwig W, Viver T, Westram R, Francisco Gago J, Bustos-Caparros E, Knittel K, Amann R, Rossello-Mora R. Release LTP_12_2020, featuring a new ARB alignment and improved 16S rRNA tree for prokaryotic type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2021; 44:126218.
🧍 Yarza et al. (2013) expected for accession GU269544, originating from the alleged type-strain deposit ATCC 27753, an affiliation with Lactobacillaceae (Bacilli) but observed an affiliation with Lachnospiraceae (Clostridia) and 94.8% similarity against Lachnospira multipara.Publication:
Yarza P, Sproer C, Swiderski J, Mrotzek N, Spring S, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Pukall R, Klenk HP, Lang E, et al. Sequencing orphan species initiative (SOS): Filling the gaps in the 16S rRNA gene sequence database for all species with validly published names. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:69-73.
🧍 Currently, the combination Lactobacillus rogosae is not represented by a type strain (Opinion 88, Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes, IJSEM 64:3578-3579).Publication:
Judicial Commission. Judicial Opinion No. 88. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3578-3579.
🧍 The type strain is not available in any established culture collection; therefore it cannot be included in any scientific study. Felis et al. request the rejection of the species name, at least until strains under accession process in the ATCC are available and confirmed as belonging to the Lactobacillus.Publication:
Beijerinck MW. Sur les ferments lactiques de l'industrie. Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles (Section 2) 1901; 6:212-243.
Assigned by:
Holdeman LV, Moore WEC. New genus, Coprococcus, twelve new species, and emended descriptions of four previously described species of bacteria from human feces. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1974; 24:260-277.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/lactobacillus-rogosaeLink copied to clipboard